Skip to content
IECR

IECRInstitute for Environmentaland Civic Research

Research into the everyday behaviours that shape Britain’s shared spaces, and policies to improve them.

Our mission

To give government and local authorities the evidence they need to fix the everyday problems of Britain’s shared spaces and foster greater levels of civic engagement.

IECR is an independent, non-profit research organisation focused on understanding the behaviours that shape our communities and local environment, and how to improve them. We address issues such as littering, fly-tipping and broader civil disobedience, using the latest methods in data and social science.

Litter and neglect are worst in the most deprived neighbourhoods, where incomes, health and educational attainment lag furthest behind. Yet neighbours there help one another as much as anywhere else. Our research looks at the conditions people live with as well as how they behave, because policy needs to address both.

More about us

People walking along a path through a park, under trees in full leaf
Interactive map

Mapping fly-tipping in England

An estimate of where recorded fly-tipping falls across England, how much more unrecorded fly-tipping there is on farms, how councils compare and what drives it.

Search any postcode, council, constituency or ward for a one-page report on where it stands, compare councils with similar councils and wards with similar wards, see how far people are from a recycling centre, and download every figure as open data.

Explore the map

Map of England coloured by recorded fly-tipping per 1,000 residents in 2024/25, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, from pale green for the lowest rates to dark brown for the highest, which cluster in and around the larger cities
Recorded
1.26 million
fly-tipping incidents recorded by councils in England in 2024/25.
Concentrated
47%
of recorded fly-tipping falls in the tenth of neighbourhoods with the highest rates.
On farms
108,000
more incidents a year on farmland, which councils’ records miss: an estimate, with a range of 27,000 to 280,000.

Ongoing research

Work under way now, to be published as reports, briefings and posts as each piece is finished.

The programmes these feed into

Cans, bottles and food packaging left strewn across a park lawn

Why we’re here

Changes in how we live are showing up in our streets and parks.

The way we live and work has changed hugely in one generation. We eat and drink a lot more on the move, order almost anything to the door in 24 hours, access cheap goods used once and then discarded, and travel around on e-bikes and scooters. Streets are full of packaging, roadsides are used as dumping grounds, and disposable vapes and nitrous oxide canisters are discarded in parks, with children consuming products never designed for them.

At the same time, the habits that once held communities together are fading. Fewer people volunteer than a decade ago, fewer give to charity. Only 11% of adults think their local area has improved in the last two years. Those habits are weakest where disadvantage is greatest. In the most deprived neighbourhoods, people are half as likely as those in the least deprived to volunteer with a group or club every month, or to be proud of where they live, and adults with no qualifications are half as likely as graduates to take part in civic life.

Problems like these sit in an awkward place: too small and complex for national attention and too diffuse for any single council to solve. IECR’s role is to be the centre of knowledge on solutions to these problems and to bring about effective, positive change at local and national levels.

Volunteering
17%
of adults volunteer with a group or club every month, down from 27% in 2013/14.
Giving
67%
gave money to charity in the past four weeks, down from 82% in 2013/14.
Pride in place
38%
of people in the most deprived neighbourhoods are proud to live there, against 79% in the least deprived.
Litter and deprivation
2.8×
as much drinks and food litter in the most deprived fifth of areas as in the least deprived.

Why it matters

Local streets are a voting issue, and few of the fixes on offer have been properly evaluated.

Ahead of England’s May 2026 local elections, more than half of adults in the areas voting said the condition of streets, roads and pavements would be very important to their vote, and among over-55s no issue was cited more often. Most people think litter is getting worse, and parties across the political spectrum have answered with tougher fines, vehicle seizures and penalty points. Few of these measures have been rigorously evaluated.

Local elections
53%
of adults in English council areas with May 2026 elections said the condition of streets, roads and pavements would be very important to their vote, more than said so of housing or climate change.
Over-55s
67%
of over-55s said the condition of streets, roads and pavements would be very important to their vote. No issue was cited more often.
Litter
77%
of adults in England think litter has become more of a problem in recent years.

The missing What Works Centre

Government relies on independent What Works Centres to tell it which interventions work, from education to policing. None covers the behaviour that shapes our shared spaces.

  • EducationEducation Endowment Foundation
  • Health and careNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence
  • Crime reductionCollege of Policing
  • Local growthWhat Works Centre for Local Economic Growth
  • Youth employmentYouth Futures Foundation
  • HomelessnessCentre for Homelessness Impact
  • Children and familiesFoundations
  • Later lifeCentre for Ageing Better
  • WalesWales Centre for Public Policy
  • Civic and environmental behaviourNo centreThe gap IECR is being set up to fill.

Why it matters, in full

Evidence-led policies

Policy interventions work only with an evidence base to support them.

We work with national and local authorities to understand which policies are most effective in changing behaviour to improve communities and the local environment. We study the effectiveness of taxes, fines and enforcement to discourage littering and fly-tipping, and the benefits of positive messaging to change behaviour. We also work with the corporate sector to understand how producers and retailers can better educate and reinforce positive social engagement.

Smoking

46% to 11%

Smoke-free law46%11%19742024
Adult smoking, 1974 to 2024. Restrictions were built on decades of research.ONS General Household Survey and General Lifestyle Survey (Great Britain, adults 16+) to 2010, then ONS Annual Population Survey (UK, adults 18+) from 2011.
View chart data
Smoking chart data
YearPercentage
197445.6%
197641.8%
197840.2%
198039.4%
198235.3%
198434%
198632.7%
198831.6%
199030%
199228.4%
199426.8%
199628%
199827.1%
200027%
200126.9%
200225.9%
200326%
200424.6%
200523.9%
200622%
200720.9%
200821.1%
200921%
201020.3%
201120.2%
201219.6%
201318.8%
201418.1%
201517.2%
201615.8%
201715.1%
201814.7%
201914.1%
202013.1%
202112.3%
202211.7%
202311.1%
202410.6%
Minimum alcohol unit pricing

13% fewer deaths

156fewer deaths a year
13 in every 100 alcohol-specific deaths no longer happen
87 in every 100 still do
Fewer alcohol-specific deaths in Scotland after a price floor that researchers at Sheffield modelled before it became law, with the biggest effect in the most deprived areas.Deaths wholly caused by alcohol in Scotland, May 2018 to December 2020, against England as a control (Wyper et al., The Lancet, 2023).
The plastic bag charge

98% fewer bags

98 in every 100 single-use bags are no longer handed out
2 in every 100 still are
Bag use since the charge, which followed evaluations of earlier levies in Ireland and Wales.From 7.6 billion bags a year before the 5p charge in 2015 to 0.13 billion in 2025/26.

What we’ll be working on

Three areas where environmental and social problems overlap.

Our research spans multiple areas including:

Our research priorities in full

A volunteer filling in a survey on a clipboard during a litter pick

How we work

From finding the causes to drafting measures that councils and departments can use.

We build a project team around each question, working with academics, councils, other NGOs and the public, through surveys and citizen science. The results come out as reports, media work and events, both in person and online.

Want to work with us, fund us, or write about us?

Get in touch